| |
|

Geithner Defends Resolution Authority Plan; Bair Raises Objections
Proposed new authority that would allow the government to step in and resolve large, failing financial institutions would not result in a category of firms deemed too big to fail, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner assured Congress on Oct. 29, 2009. Geithner told the House Financial Services Committee that the proposed legislation, announced a day earlier by the Treasury Department and the committee, would mean that if systemically important firms got themselves in the position where they could not survive on their own, “then the only authority we would have is to manage their failure.” Committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., said he hoped to mark up the legislation next week.
Geithner stressed that the bill would not provide a government guarantee for troubled financial firms, create a fixed list of systemically important firms or provide a permanent Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)-like authority. In addition, “it does not give comfort to investors, creditors, counterparties, or management that the government will be there to absorb losses from risky business strategies,” he said.
“Without the ability for the government to step in and manage the failure of a large firm and contain the risk of the fire spreading we will be consigned to repeat the experience of last fall. It’s a really stark, simple thing,” Geithner told lawmakers, some of whom are concerned with what they view as increased government intervention in the financial markets.
Republican committee members criticized the proposal. Ranking Member Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., said the proposal put taxpayers first in line to bear the costs of dissolving large financial firms, while Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., described the proposed legislation as “TARP on steroids.”
Disagreements Among Regulators
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairman Sheila Bair disagreed with how the bill would pay for resolving insolvent institutions. Bair urged the creation of a Financial Company Resolution Fund, pre-funded by levies on larger financial firms, in order to fund the resolution process. Treasury and Frank have proposed that if the assets of a failed institution were insufficient to fund the receivership, assessments then should be levied on a range of large firms to make up the difference. Geithner argued that a standing fund would create an expectation that the government would step in to protect shareholders and creditors from losses and would be viewed as a form of insurance.
Bair also asserted that the proposed oversight council would lack sufficient authority to effectively address systemic risks. Appropriate safeguards need to be established to preserve the independence of financial regulation from political influence, she said, and to that end she is proposing that the chairman of the council be a presidential appointee subject to Senate confirmation, not the Treasury Secretary.
|
|
| Free White Papers |
| Credit
Card Reform: An Analysis of the Credit CARD Act
By Katalina M. Bianco, J.D.
Download
PDF
Comparative Analysis of Non-U.S. Bank Regulatory
Reform and Banking Structure
By Gregg D. Killoren, J.D.
Download
PDF
The Cost of FACT Act Compliance: New Research
Study Finds that Financial Institutions Are Underestimating Cost
By Adam Elliott
Download
PDF
Financial Regulation Reform: What to Expect in
the 111th Congress
By James Hamilton
Download
White Paper
The Other Bailout: How the Fed Is Financing the
Financiers, and Related SEC Disclosure
By Mark S. Nelson
Download
White Paper
The Economic Bailout: An Analysis of the Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act
By Katalina M. Bianco and John M. Pachkowski
Download
White Paper |
Product Spotlight
Bankruptcy Law Guide
New
bankruptcy legislative requirements and changing economic
conditions have drastically increased the amount of information
required to handle this costly and uncertain area of law. The Bankruptcy
Law Reporter provides all the most up-to-date
information necessary to navigate the maze of bankruptcy law.
Whether it's simply ensuring your company is on solid legal and
financial ground, settling court disputes or protecting your own
personal interests in a corporate or personal case, the answers
are all here.
More Info...
|
Bank Digest
Bank Digest tracks the latest banking activity, regulatory changes and trends in federal banking policy. Each day, Bank Digest provides both a concise abstract and the full text of that day's releases from the federal agencies that impact the banking industry. Bank Digest also provides additional detail of significant events in weekly and monthly features.
More Info...
|
Consumer Credit Guide
In
the past, many states have attempted to cure problems and abuses
that have appeared on a "one-at-a-time" basis,
resulting in a multiplicity of consumer credit laws. In
addition, the federal government has injected standards into
broad areas of consumer credit previously regulated only by the
states. The CCH Consumer
Credit Guide publishes the information that you need
to succeed in the complex area of state and federal consumer
credit laws and regulations.
More Info...
|
Financial Privacy Law Guide
This product provides comprehensive coverage of federal and state laws, regulations, interpretations and decisions.
The Guide covers data security, insurance and health information privacy, fair credit reporting, bank secrecy, identity
theft, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the E-Sign Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Freedom of Information Act,
the Right to Financial Privacy Act and international privacy.
More Info...
|
State Banking Law Reporter

Expedite your research with the CCH© State Banking Law Reporter. Now there's a single source for state
banking law, giving banking professionals and legal counsel ready access to the information you need. State
Banking Law Reporter combines the full text of state laws and regulations with authoritative explanations and
consistent, topical organization.
More Info...
|
|
|