Qui tam False Claims Act claims arising from a contract to clean up a uranium processing facility were summarily denied by the District Court for the Southern District of Ohio because the undisputed facts showed the contractor complied with requirements governing on-site disposal and did not violate air pollution standards. The relator alleged the contractor violated contract provisions on disposing radioactive material from demolished silos. According to the relator, the contractor knew material from the silos entered the soil during the demolition process but nonetheless put the soil into an on-site disposal facility without ensuring content material had been removed. The relator argued the contractor violated the FCA as a matter of law by sending claims for payment to the government that stated the claims adhered to all contract terms.
(The news featured above is a selection from the news covered in the Government Contracts Report Letter, which is published weekly and distributed to subscribers of the Government Contracts Reporter. )