A holding the government breached an implied-in-fact warranty when it inadvertently sold a vehicle containing concealed narcotics was reversed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit because the government's failure to perform its regulatory responsibilities did not provide a contractual remedy and the sales contract explicitly disclaimed all warranties. The Court of Federal Claims held the auction sale of a vehicle containing hidden marijuana constituted a breach of an implied-in-fact warranty because the government represented the vehicle was free of illegal substances and the contractor reasonably assumed the government removed all contraband (52 CCF ¶78,975). An implied-in-fact agreement requires a "meeting of minds" that can be inferred from the conduct of the parties. The CFC determined the foundation of the parties' belief was an expectation that the government had fulfilled its regulatory duty to remove any contraband from the vehicle before selling it.