The government's motion to stay three appeals pending False Claims Act litigation was denied by the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, except for a discrete portion of one appeal, because the government failed to demonstrate its need for the suspension outweighed the harm the contractor would suffer by delaying the appeals. The dispute arose from a contract to provide bomb fuzes, which the government terminated for default after revoking its acceptance of a large number of defective fuzes. The contractor subsequently filed three appeals: the first involved a deemed denial of four contract interpretation questions, the second challenged the default termination, and the third contested the government's demand for payment. The government sought to stay the appeals pending proceedings in an FCA civil lawsuit against the contractor.