(The article featured
below is a selection from SEC
No-Action Letter Weekly, which is available to subscribers
of that publication.)
Staff Grants Relief to Advisers in Wake of Government
Intervention
The Division of Investment Management confirmed oral
no-action relief granted to SEC-registered investment advisers affiliated with
Fortis Investment Management SA in a letter dated January 27, 2009 in connection
with the government seizure of Fortis Group. Multiple sovereign governments
acted to prevent the collapse of Fortis during the market turmoil last fall.
Given the emergency nature of the actions, the staff advised that it would not
recommend enforcement action against the Fortis advisers or the registered
investment companies for which they serve if the Fortis advisers serve as
investment advisers under a continuance without prior in-person approval by the
board of directors and without approval by a majority of the outstanding voting
securities.
Fortis Group is an international banking, insurance
and financial services company headquartered in Europe. The Fortis advisers
serve institutional and high net worth clients around the world, including
SEC-registered investment companies. When the global financial crisis led
Belgian and Dutch regulators to fear that investors and depositors had lost
confidence in Fortis, they acquired ownership positions in Fortis Group.
The regulators' goal was to provide temporary relief
through cash infusions and stabilize Fortis while a private sector buyer was
found. When the decline in market confidence in Fortis continued, the government
bought out the remaining stake.
The Investment Company Act provides that, in the event
of an assignment, the advisory agreements terminate automatically. An assignment
is any direct or indirect transfer of an agreement by the assignor, or of a
controlling block of the assignor's outstanding voting securities, by the
security holder of the assignor. The Act permits an investment adviser to serve
temporarily after the advisory agreements are terminated under interim
agreements subject to certain conditions.
One condition is that each fund's board, including a
majority of the non-interested directors, must have voted in person to approve
the interim contract in advance of the termination of the shareholder-approved
previous contract. The interim contract may not have a duration longer than 150
days after the date of termination.
One or more of the stages of nationalization may have
resulted in the change of control of the Fortis advisers and an assignment of
their advisory agreements. Each of the boards of the SEC-registered investment
companies met in person or by teleconference within 10 business days of the
termination event and approved a continuance of the advisory agreements with
respect to the nationalization.
Given the speed of the transactions and the highly
unusual circumstances which involved three national governments, Fortis
explained that it was not practical for the investment company boards to meet in
person to approve the continuations prior to the termination of the advisory
agreements. The transactions were triggered by emergency measures brokered by
sovereign states in an effort to prevent the collapse of a major financial
institution and stem the worldwide financial crisis.
Fortis asked the staff to grant relief with respect to
shareholder meetings out of concern that the solicitation of mutual fund
shareholder proxies would confuse shaken investors further and lead to needless
redemptions. The costs associated with soliciting proxies and holding a
shareholder vote outweighed the potential benefits, according to Fortis. Fortis
assured the staff that a proxy statement will be prepared and shareholder votes
will be obtained in connection with a sale of certain assets to BNP Paribas.
The staff granted the relief in part because
management personnel was left in place to restore confidence in the business and
eventually return it to the private sector. The nationalization did not result
in any substantive changes to the terms of the advisory agreements or the
day-to-day personnel providing services under the agreements. Shareholders have
been advised of the nationalization by supplements to the funds' prospectuses or
by letter.
Under the circumstances, the staff agreed that Fortis
advisers may continue to serve the funds under a continuance without prior
in-person approval by the board and without approval by a majority of the funds'
outstanding voting securities.
|