(The news featured
below is a selection from the news covered in SEC Today, which is distributed to
subscribers of SEC
Today.)
Thomsen Reviews Age Old Themes Involving Conflict of Interest
SEC Enforcement Director Linda Chatman Thomsen believes
there really is nothing new under the sun when it comes to conflicts of interest
in the financial services industry. In remarks before a recent IA Week and
Investment Adviser Association summit, Thomsen explained how the staff
"follows the money" to uncover the variations on age old themes of
misconduct. Thomsen's prepared remarks are on the SEC's Web site.
One area in which the interests of a mutual fund adviser
may conflict with the interests of its clients is distribution, according to
Thomsen. The staff has seen problems where advisers face conflicts with respect
to payments made for distribution but fail to disclose the information to the
fund boards. She gave an example of a recent series of cases brought against
fund advisers that used brokerage to satisfy their own revenue sharing
obligations with select broker-dealers, but failed to disclose the practice to
the boards or shareholders.
Thomsen doubts these cases will be the last in which mutual
fund advisers have found ways to benefit from distribution payments without
disclosing the information. She urged compliance professionals to look for
variations on this theme.
Thomsen said the SEC also remains concerned about advisers
that use their influence to structure or to recommend mutual fund service
arrangements in a way that benefits the adviser at the expense of the funds. She
cited the case against Citigroup as an example. Compliance officers should be
vigilant in looking for instances of overreaching, she said, and should ensure
that adequate controls are in place to prevent it.
The staff also has followed the money to hedge funds,
Thomsen reported. There are numerous examples of fraud by hedge fund managers,
including the theft of assets, fraudulent valuations of the securities held by
the fund, and false information about performance. Thomsen said that in some
cases, the managers started out with the intent to deceive investors, but in
most cases, managers got in over their heads and tried to cover their tracks.
The staff has seen an increase in trading violations by
hedge fund managers, according to Thomsen. The violations include market
manipulation, deceptive market timing and late trading, illegal short selling
and insider trading. The staff is also concerned about conflicts that exist when
an advisory firm manages hedge funds or other highly profitable accounts as well
as other client accounts. This arrangement can provide a powerful incentive to
benefit the hedge fund over the other clients through trading strategies or
allocation practices, she explained.
Brokerage is a client asset, Thomsen said, and it must be
treated that way. There are many temptations to use client brokerage in a manner
that benefits the advisers and their personnel at the expense of clients, she
warned. She said similar concerns may be raised with soft dollars. The staff has
uncovered aggressive undisclosed soft dollar practices that violate the law, she
advised.
Thomsen said that one of her pet peeves is firms that turn
a blind eye to how big producers are making their money. These big producers
often became big by engaging in misconduct, she noted. Some firms appear to want
to avoid questioning the "cash cow" too closely, she explained, and
some firms become complicit in the misconduct. She reminded management that it
is responsible for ensuring that all employees, including the top producers, are
complying with the federal securities laws. If the staff finds situations where
management has turned a blind eye to misconduct, Thomsen it will seek to hold
management and the firm accountable.
Jacquelyn Lumb
|