(The news featured
below is a selection from the news covered in SEC Today, which is distributed to
subscribers of SEC
Today.)
White Suggests Phase-In Process for Ending IFRS/GAAP Reconciliation
Division of Corporation Finance Director John White said
recently that it might be useful to consider a phase-in process for ending the
requirement that foreign private issuers using international financial reporting
standards ("IFRS") reconcile their financial statements to U.S. GAAP.
He suggested that certain issuers could be relieved of the requirement on a
trial basis before the conditions of the SEC's convergence roadmap have been
fully achieved. The idea needs much more consideration among the staff before
going further, he said. White spoke at a NYSE/Brooklyn Law School roundtable,
and his remarks are posted on the SEC's Web site.
White said the idea stems from the comments he heard at a
recent SEC roundtable on IFRS/GAAP convergence, at which there was considerable
support for moving quickly through the remaining steps of the roadmap. In light
of what participants said, White suggested that the staff might start by
recommending that the Commission end the requirement to reconcile interim period
financial statements. The idea is still in the very early stages, he emphasized.
White supports ending the reconciliation requirement, as
long as IFRS is widely used and consistently and faithfully applied across
companies and jurisdictions. He believes that it is now time for the Commission
to formally state its views on the issue. By offering its official opinion, he
said, the Commission could provide a powerful signal of the seriousness with
which it views the matter and a good next step down the road of aligning the
SEC's rules with a world where reconciliation is not needed.
White noted that the chorus of voices calling for the U.S.
to recognize and accept financial reports filed with IFRS has become louder in
recent months. The move was among the eight recommendations of the
Bloomberg/Schumer report, and was supported by SEC roundtable participants.
At the roundtable, White said he was struck by the fact
that most of the market participants calling for the end of the reconciliation
requirement are already ahead of the SEC. The various players and participants
in U.S. capital markets, whether intermediaries or investors, already accept
IFRS, he noted. Foreign private issuers want reconciliation to end, as do large
domestic issuers with multinational operations. In many cases, those U.S.
issuers already use IFRS for various reporting purposes, he said.
White believes that reconciliation cannot be ended
carelessly. Among the critical concerns yet to be addressed is the
sustainability of funding for the IASB, which is responsible for maintaining
IFRS. At the moment, the industry should remain focused on the convergence
process and on the robustness and strength of IFRS while sticking to the SEC's
roadmap for ending reconciliation, he said.
Ending reconciliation and allowing IFRS reporting in the
U.S. would improve the attractiveness and competitive position of U.S. capital
markets, White said. He also believes that the staff needs to work in earnest to
analyze and address the question of allowing U.S. issuers to report in IFRS
rather than GAAP. Addressing this issue and its many competitive implications is
an essential piece of the larger picture, he said.
Moving toward U.S. issuers' use of IFRS is likely to
uncover some problems. For example, White said that he was surprised to learn
that U.S. colleges do not today generally teach IFRS to accounting students. If
the SEC allows U.S. companies to report in IFRS, there is likely to be a large
learning curve before there would be sufficient accountants to prepare those
financial statements, or to audit them, he noted.
Even so, White feels that U.S. issuers reporting in IFRS,
like ending reconciliation, is not too far away and the industry and the SEC
just need to figure out how to get there. White does not believe that ending
reconciliation for foreign private issuers should be held up while the other
issue is under consideration.
John Filar Atwood
|