(The news featured
below is a selection from the news covered in Federal Securities Law Reporter,
which is distributed to subscribers of Federal
Securities Law Reporter.)
Cox Discusses Fund Initiatives and Enforcement Policy
At the recent Mutual Fund Directors Forum, Chairman
Christopher Cox discussed plans to address rule 12b-1, the mutual fund
governance rule, 401(k) plans and soft dollars. Cox also talked about the SEC's
policy for the enforcement staff to obtain full Commission approval before
commencing settlement discussions in enforcement proceedings. The cases in which
approval must be obtained are those involving monetary penalties against a
company. Cox's prepared remarks are posted on the SEC's Web site.
Cox advised that no formal investigation is initiated, no
case is filed and no settlement is agreed upon without Commission approval. The
Commission review should guarantee fairness and "horizontal equity" in
a nationwide enforcement program, he said. He believes the enforcement staff
will hold the strongest negotiating position if the Commission has reviewed the
range of outcomes before the settlement offers are made.
Where the need for consistency is greatest, Commission
approval will be obtained before settlement discussions are commenced, he
explained. When cases are settled within the range of guidance provided by the
Commission, they will be eligible for summary approval through the seriatim
process. In the cases involving monetary penalties against companies, Cox said
the Commission is anxious to ensure that the precedents are clear, consistent
and in accordance with the instructions of Congress in the Remedies Act.
The procedural change is not intended to bring about higher
or lower penalties, according to Cox, but to ensure that the laws are vigorously
enforced with the benefit of full Commission review. Cox added his prediction
that future penalties will be higher since the staff lawyers will not have to
hedge their bets out of fear the Commission will not back them up. Cox said this
approach should give the enforcement staff more flexibility and better tools to
do their jobs more effectively.
With respect to upcoming initiatives, Cox said there are
numerous reasons to question the continuing viability of 12b-1 plans. Today's
uses for the 12b-1 fees barely resemble the rule's original purpose, he said,
which is why it is time for a thorough reevaluation. The original premise of the
rule seems highly suspect in today's world, he added. Cox said that independent
directors' decision as to whether to approve a 12b-1 plan, with payments coming
out of fund assets, "has to be no" unless the existing shareholders
will benefit.
Cox said the SEC intends to repropose and then finalize the
mutual fund governance rule with careful adherence to the court's procedural
requirements. The staff is also engaged in a broad initiative to examine the
adequacy of the disclosure by mutual funds and other investment vehicles to
investors in 401(k) plans. The goal is to make it easier for investors to
understand the after-tax, after-inflation returns they will receive compared to
an appropriate index, according to Cox.
The SEC will work with the Department of Labor to improve
the disclosure, Cox said. He is confident that a great deal can be achieved in
the coming months. Cox said the current arrangements for Americans preparing for
retirement "fall tragically short." The staff is developing a proposal
for more easy-to-understand disclosure documents.
The SEC also continues to examine the effects of soft
dollars on obtaining the best execution of trades. Cox said the very concept of
soft dollars may be at odds with clarity in describing fees and costs to
investors. The SEC will consider whether fund boards could better assess soft
dollar arrangements if better disclosure of the research and brokerage services
that an adviser receives in return for a bundled commission is made mandatory.
The SEC's recent interpretive guidance on soft dollars may
not be sufficient to eliminate the abuses the SEC has discovered. The release
was important, according to Cox, but was not the last word on the subject.
Jacquelyn Lumb
|