(The news featured
below is a selection from the news covered in the Federal Securities Law Reporter,
which is distributed to subscribers of SEC
Today.)
Cox Testifies on Measures for
Improving Financial Disclosures
SEC Chairman Christopher Cox, in testimony before the
Senate Banking Committee, said he is pursuing four key initiatives to improve
the quality of disclosure for investors: moving disclosure from boilerplate to
plain English, moving the disclosure in long, hard-to-read documents to
easy-to-navigate Web pages, reducing accounting complexity and reducing fraud,
especially when aimed at elderly Americans. Cox called for an all-out war on
complexity which he said will require the concerted efforts of the SEC, FASB and
the PCAOB. The effort will require a commitment for the long term, he said, but
he believes it will be well worth it.
Committee Chairman Richard Shelby (R-AL), referring to his
hearing last month on credit rating agencies, said there is a virtual consensus
on the need to promote competition, address conflicts of interest and establish
regulatory oversight. He asked Cox for his views on the impact of the
concentration in the industry. Cox acknowledged the intense focus by the Banking
Committee and the SEC in recent years. He said it is important to avoid any new
barriers to entry and to provide an entry process that is transparent and
timely.
Shelby noted that the regulation of rating agencies begins
and ends with the SEC's recognition of a rating agency as a nationally
recognized statistical rating organization. There is no further oversight, he
said. Cox said the SEC's options with respect to credit agencies, without
additional authority from Congress, include the withdrawal of the no-action
letter recognizing the rating agency as an NRSRO or it could bring an
enforcement action if warranted. He noted that Standard & Poor's, Moody's
and Fitch are registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act, so the
Commission has oversight of their investment advisory functions.
Senator Paul Sarbanes (D-MD) pointed to the rebound in the
market since the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed and noted the tendency to forget
about scandals. However, he cited three SEC enforcement actions in the past
month, including a $250 million settlement with Bear Stearns for late trading
and market timing abuses, a settlement of $50 million from Tyco for improper
accounting. Sarbanes asked if the SEC has the resources and expertise to detect
problems in the hedge fund industry.
Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE) followed up on Sarbanes' hedge
fund inquiry, noting that he and Christopher Dodd (D-CT) will hold a hearing May
16 on hedge funds. Cox has been asked to testify at the hearing along with other
members of the President's Working Group on Capital Markets. Hagel asked Cox if
the SEC's hedge fund rules had gone into effect even though they were being
challenged in federal court. Cox said there was no change in status and the
rules had gone into effect as written. A small group may be holding off
registration while the lawsuit is pending, he said.
Several senators were concerned that Fannie Mae was
permitted to continue its listing on the New York Stock Exchange even though it
had not filed its periodic reports since 2004. Cox said Fannie Mae had a
timetable for preparing its financial statements and submitting its filings with
the SEC. He attributed some of the delay to Fannie Mae's transition to 1934 Act
reporting. Hagel said that, given the SEC's focus on investors, he would expect
concern about a public company that has filed no financial statements since 2004
and continues its listing. He believes it sends the wrong message to the
markets.
Senator John Sununu (R-NH) said the delay was not related
to Fannie Mae's compliance with 1934 Act reporting but due to its accounting
irregularities and attempts to manipulate its earnings. He said it set a very
bad precedent to provide the exemption from delisting.
Some of the senators cited a recent study by Ernst &
Young which addressed the drop in the number of large company initial public
offerings in the U.S. Sarbanes said a number of IPOs went to foreign exchanges
because they were privatizations of formerly state-owned enterprises and listed
on the local exchanges due to political direction. Some exchanges are
aggressively marketing their lower regulatory standards, he added, but he
believes the U.S. should continue as the gold standard for regulation and
corporate governance.
Dodd asked about the final report that was submitted to the
SEC by the Advisory Committee on Smaller Public Companies and its recommendation
on section 404 that would remove 80% of public companies from its requirements.
Cox said the emphasis is on making section 404 work without unnecessary costs.
Section 404 was a modest part of the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation, he said, but
Auditing Standard No. 2 runs hundreds of pages. Some of the problems relate to
the practices that developed under AS2, he explained. Cox said it is not a
question of to whom section 404 should apply but how. The SEC will work with the
PCAOB to get all of the benefits without the unnecessary costs, he said. Cox
noted that the Advisory Committee pointed to the lack of a workable framework
for smaller companies, and COSO is working on a framework that may present a
solution. He added that the SEC wants to do what Congress intended with respect
to the statute.
Several senators raised concerns about Regulation B.
Senator Jim Bunning (R-KY) referred to a letter that was sent to former SEC
Chairman William Donaldson asking that the regulation be withdrawn given the
opposition by banking regulators. Cox advised that he was meeting with banking
regulators after the hearing to attempt to hammer out a regulatory response to
their concerns. Senator Michael Crapo (R-ID) said that he has concluded that
additional legislative guidance is needed under Regulation B to provide
regulatory relief for financial institutions. Cox expressed willingness to work
with Congress and said it was high time to adopt final rules.
|