(The news featured
below is a selection from the news covered in the Federal Securities Law Reporter,
which is distributed to subscribers of SEC
Today.)
Atkins Discusses Foreign Issuers'
Concerns in Paris Speech
During a recent speech in Paris, SEC Commissioner Paul
Atkins expressed concerns that some of the SEC's regulations may be discouraging
foreign investment. In an ideal world, he said that neither the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act nor the implementing rules should dissuade a foreign company from
considering a U.S. listing. However, Atkins acknowledged that the decisions of
foreign issuers are being influenced by the real and the perceived costs of
Sarbanes-Oxley compliance.
Atkins also discussed foreign issuers' concerns about
deregistering from the U.S. markets because of the costs and uncertainties
surrounding the process. The SEC proposed rules to make the termination of a
foreign private issuer's reporting requirements less difficult. Atkins believes
the SEC should allow for as much flexibility as possible. The deregistration
proposal has triggered a debate over the number of foreign issuers that would be
eligible to rely on the new rules, if adopted. While the numbers have ranged
from 5% to 26% of issuers that may be eligible, Atkins reminded the audience
that the underlying premise of the rule is to relieve companies of their
registration obligations where there is relatively little interest by U.S.
investors in the domestic market.
Atkins spoke about the efforts underway to achieve
convergence between U.S. GAAP and international financial reporting standards.
He is optimistic about the progress to date, but added that achieving evenness
in the application of new standards may be just as important as narrowing the
differences between accounting systems. The U.S. is watching the transition to
IFRS with great interest, according to Atkins, and recognizes the difficulty of
the process.
Atkins raised concerns about suggestions by some that
U.S. companies should be required to reconcile their U.S. GAAP financial
statements to IFRS. Atkins said that approach would undermine efforts toward
mutual recognition. Some see it as a useful bargaining chip, but Atkins said it
would be counterproductive. The collective efforts of parties on both sides of
the Atlantic should focus on ensuring the success of IFRS, in his view.
|