Harley-Davidson, Inc.
Date: 3/12/10; 3/22/10; 3/30/10
SIC No.: 3751
Subject Filing: 10-K
State: WI
Accession No. (Staff Letter):
0000000000-10-013968; 0000000000-10-017144
Accession No. (Co. Letter): 0001193125-10-063300
The staff, upon reviewing the Form 10-K filed by
Harley-Davidson, inquired further regarding the company's
disclosures related to certain off-balance sheet finance receivables
securitization transactions. The staff noted that the company had
adopted FASB ASC 320-10-65-1 and disclosed the components of
impairment for the period ending December 31, 2009. The staff,
however, further observed that FASB ASC 320-10-45-8A requires a
company to disclose the total other-than-temporary impairment offset
by the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment that is
recognized in other comprehensive income on the face of the
statement of operations. The staff requested that Harley-Davidson
make the appropriate disclosures on the face of the statement of
operations and show the components. The staff noted that the company
should include a table showing total other-than-temporary impairment
losses (including amounts included in earnings and other
comprehensive income) offset for the amount that is included in
other comprehensive income resulting in the amount of impairment
losses recognized in earnings.
In its reply the company stated that it concluded that
the amounts relevant to other-than-temporary impairment and related
components were immaterial and need not be disclosed on the face of
the statement of operations. The company also noted that it provided
the required tabular disclosure elsewhere in its Form 10-K. The
company stated that in its future filings it will continue to
provide the tabular disclosure, even though it believes that
disclosure on the face of the statement of operations is not
required, since the amounts involved are immaterial. The company
also noted that it had considered the effect of adopting SFAS 166.
In addition, the staff asked the company to explain why it
reclassified a portion of the impairment loss from other
comprehensive income to current earnings after it adopted FASB ASC
30-10-55-64. The company explained that it had reclassified $6
million that was recorded in other comprehensive income, non-credit
related losses, to earnings as credit-related losses. The
reclassification was prompted by a positive change in the discount
rate coupled with the negative effect of reduced cash flows due to
credit losses, and the application of SFAS 115-1. The staff
subsequently indicated that it had no further comments.