(The news featured
below is a selection from the news covered in the Federal Securities Law Reporter,
which is distributed to subscribers of SEC
Today.)
Glassman Calls for Fewer
Bright-Line Tests In Accounting
In remarks at a recent conference at the University of
Southern California's Leventhal School of Accounting, Commissioner Cynthia
Glassman discussed the complexity of financial reporting and accounting
standards. She believes that accounting standards have become overly
prescriptive and provide too many bright-line tests that are vulnerable to
financial engineering. Many constituencies have asked for, and received,
bright-line tests in virtually all areas of financial reporting, according to
Glassman. Preparers or parties to a transaction may then structure the
transaction so that it achieves the desired accounting treatment, even though it
may obscure the principles underlying the accounting standard, she said.
Glassman singled out hedge accounting as one example where
some companies have altered the way they otherwise hedge their financial risk
for the sole purpose of meeting the shortcut criteria outlined in FAS 133. FAS
133 may have resulted in the unintended consequence of impeding optimal risk
management, she explained. Glassman said that reporting requirements and
accounting standards should not drive business practices. Instead, the business
reality of a transaction should determine how it is reported.
Lease accounting is another example in which companies
could take advantage of the bright-line aspects of the standards to make a
financed purchase look like a rental contract, according to Glassman. She noted
that a cottage industry has sprung up to address leasing issues, largely based
on the accounting standards. She said that similar problems exist with revenue
recognition, pensions, and allocation and impairment testing related to purchase
accounting.
Glassman advised that prescriptive accounting rules may
also create legal problems for preparers and issuers, both through the potential
for overly aggressive accounting to take advantage of the complexity, or through
honest mistakes that may lead to restatements or securities law violations.
Glassman supports the FASB initiative to codify all of the
accounting literature that constitutes generally accepted accounting principles
in one place. She suggested that the initiative be expanded to include the
literature issued by all of the standard setters, including the SEC, in order to
clarify and rationalize accounting standards.
Standard setters should work to ensure that accounting
standards are principles-based and objectives-oriented, she added. Glassman also
proposed that standards encourage management to disclose key performance
indicators and other relevant information. Management should concentrate on the
best way to manage the company, not manage the numbers, she said.
The SEC should simplify its rules and streamline its
regulatory scheme, in Glassman's view. It should identify and eliminate obsolete
and duplicative regulations, rationalize definitions, update regulatory
thresholds and consolidate forms, she said. The SEC should take advantage of
advances in Internet and communication technology, according to Glassman,
including the use of interactive data. Glassman is convinced that the use of
interactive data could make the information that registrants file with the SEC
more useful to investors and other global market constituents.
Cox Remarks on Section 404
In recent remarks at the Harvard Business School Global
Leadership Forum, Chairman Christopher Cox advised that the SEC and the PCAOB
are working together to make Sarbanes-Oxley Act section 404 more efficient and
cost-effective. The SEC plans to issue guidance to help management in its
assessment of internal controls over financial reporting.
The SEC is working with the PCAOB to propose revisions
to Auditing Standard No. 2 to ensure that auditors concentrate on areas of
higher risk. The standard should spell out what role, if any, the auditor should
play in evaluating a company's assessment of its internal controls, according to
Cox. He explained that the goal is to significantly reduce the compliance costs
of section 404 while improving investor protection. This undertaking will help
conform the SEC's and the PCAOB's rules to those of other high-standards
countries, he said.
|