Conference Panelists Review Risk Management
J. Michael Cook, a corporate director, spoke about the
board's processes for overseeing risk at the Practising Law Institute's recent
Audit Committee Workshop. Since the financial crisis, a lot of time is spent on
meetings. New demands on audit committees may make it more difficult to find
people willing to serve if the pressures continue, he said.
In discussions of enterprise risk, Cook said financial
reporting is rarely mentioned, but the risk of misleading financial reports is
huge. The credit crunch has raised financial reporting risks including critical
accounting estimates and judgments, he said. There are new items to consider in
the current environment. Revenue recognition is a critical accounting issue.
Companies should consider the credit condition of their customers. Inventory
valuations may change because there is more of it or there is a greater
potential for obsolescence, he said.
There should be a heightened level of attention on how
long an entity plans to hold investments and its ability to hold them to
maturity. The way things have always been done may no longer hold, Cook said.
Banks that have always been willing to roll over debt may no longer be willing
to do so. Management should also stress test the company's loan covenants. Cook
said the tone at the top is critical in this environment.
Cook believes the credit crunch should be on the
agenda of every audit committee meeting for the foreseeable future. This is not
a year-end issue, he warned. Cook also said for those still issuing earnings
guidelines, the pressure is greater. The credit crisis provided an opportunity
to stop issuing the guidance, in his view.
Cook was asked when it is appropriate to consider
changing one's auditor. He suggested that audit committees challenge the quality
of service they are getting. He is not an advocate of periodic changes for the
sake of change, but said companies should get what they expect. They many change
components of the audit team without changing the entire team, he added.
Michael McAlevey, vice president and chief corporate,
securities and finance counsel at General Electric Company, spoke about
financial services reform and its potential impact on companies' business
models. There may be changes in taxes as the government looks for ways to pay
for its initiatives, such as the elimination of certain deductions. Incentives
and compensation may be affected. McAlevey said that people and staffing may
also change with pressure to control costs. Those changes can affect a company's
ability to comply with new regulations.
Corporate management is probably held in the lowest
esteem possible already, McAlevey said. He urged management to avoid getting
caught in a Wall Street Journal article based on corporate aircraft and
similar issues relating to perks. Whether corporate aircraft is a benefit or
not, McAlevey cautioned management to be attuned to the current environment. He
believes that responsible companies have reacted to recent events with better
risk identification and mitigation. He does not believe that additional laws are
needed, but believes that political expedience will lead to new laws anyway.
When asked how best to allocate responsibilities
between risk and audit committees, Cook said he does not buy the notion that the
audit committee is responsible for overseeing risk. There is nothing more
devastating to a public company than to lose its reputation in the financial
markets, he said. The full board has the responsibility for overseeing risk, he
said, but can delegate elements to various committees.
Cook mentioned a recent conference at which three
board members of a well-known company were present. He asked them to list the
company's top risks and was surprised by the diversity of their responses which
made it clear that the issue had never been addressed. Cook said every board
member should know what their company's greatest risks are and all should be
able to name the same top risks.
The legislation would
mandate that each company must provide appropriate funding, as determined by the
compensation committee, to enable the committee to engage and adequately
compensate compensation consultants, outside counsel and any other advisers
employed by the compensation committee. Further, the legislation would direct
the SEC to establish standards for ensuring the independence of compensation
consultants and outside counsel used by the compensation committee.
Senator Charles
Schumer (D-MA) has sponsored a bill requiring say on pay as part of a broad
shareholder rights reform package. The Shareholder Bill of Rights Act, S. 1074,
would require public companies to hold an annual advisory vote on executive
compensation policies and would require shareholder approval of executive golden
parachutes.