|
|
(The news
featured below is a selection from the news covered in the Federal Securities
Report Letter, which is distributed to subscribers of the Federal
Securities Law Reports.)
Oxley Wants Greater Transparency
for Mutual Funds
Congress must carefully examine mutual
funds and insist on integrity, transparency and accountability, according to
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Michael G. Oxley, who spoke at a
conference hosted by the Heritage Foundation and the New Millennium Research
Council. The mutual fund investor "fights an uphill battle for real returns
against the always-confusing array of sales commissions or loads, 12b-1 fees,
and assorted management fees," said Mr. Oxley. In addition, he emphasized
that mutual fund investors have to evaluate funds' after-tax performance and
effect on their bottom lines. Extra charges and fees have added up to billions
of dollars that go into investors' accounts every day, he noted, estimating the
cumulative cost at $14 billion over the next 10 years.
Moreover, mutual fund companies spend
billions of dollars for so-called "soft dollar arrangements" with
brokerage firms to purchase outside research products, said the chairman. While
legal, the arrangements "may be a disincentive for companies to demand the
very best research and to pay the least for it," he added. Because soft
dollar arrangements can be an annual commitment for a certain level of trading,
they can obligate portfolio managers to trade, regardless of whether it is in
the best interest of the shareholders, according to the senior House leader. The
excessive trading might be a contributing factor to poor mutual fund performance
and poor after-tax performance for the investing public, he contended.
Noting that mutual fund performance is
below market averages, Chairman Oxley questioned the soft dollar arrangements
and their effect on investors' returns. "It's an interesting subject the
Financial Services Committee may very well explore this year," he said.
The SEC has proposed two rules to
require increased transparency and additional disclosure in mutual fund
investments. The first regulation would require the disclosure of votes cast on
behalf of mutual fund shareholders as well as the policies and procedures for
proxy voting (2002 CCH Dec. ¶86,728).
"This is a common sense effort to restore investor confidence and in the
spirit of the reforms mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act last year,"
explained Mr. Oxley. The other proposal (¶86,811
) calls on mutual funds to disclose holdings more often, giving consumers
more current and valuable information on which to base their investment
decisions, said the chairman, who added that he has asked the General Accounting
Office to study current trends in mutual fund fees, disclosure and transparency.
"We believe that greater attention to these details will benefit millions
of American investors," he concluded.
|
|
|
|