(The article featured
below is a selection from International
Securities and Financial Reporting Update, which is available to subscribers
of that publication.)
IOSCO Head Discusses Virtual Super Regulation
The best way to predict the future is to invent it,
said the chair of the Int'l. Organization of Securities Commissions
("IOSCO"), Jane Diplock, during a speech on global securities
perspectives. She was quoting U.S. computer scientist Alan Kay, adding that she
believes regulators have the capacity to invent the future of securities markets
regulation. In her view, the world is moving toward virtual super regulation,
where instead of a super regulator at the global level, various agreements form
international thinking and practice.
Today's markets are truly global, according to
Diplock, with an increasing interdependence of markets in different national
jurisdictions. Exchanges have also changed greatly, through technology and
through their ownership structure, she added. With demutualization, exchanges
are now motivated by maximizing shareholder returns, and they compete to capture
the broadest customer base through alliances, host relationships, franchises and
mergers, according to Diplock. The motivation of the exchanges is to meet the
demand for ever more cost-effective trading, she noted.
Diplock believes that calls for a super regulator
are impractical, since it would require domestic regulators to cede authority to
an international body. She continued in the speech by outlining what form global
regulation might take, calling it virtual super regulation.
By virtual super regulation, Diplock means the sum
of the recognition agreements entered into by the major capital markets of the
world. IOSCO's 30 broad principles and its multilateral memorandum of
understanding are at the center of these arrangements, and mutual recognition
agreements are gaining acknowledgment as a solution for effective regulation in
a world of cross-border trade. Mutual recognition allows domestic laws and
regulations to reflect national imperatives while providing the capacity for
cross-border cooperation and enforcement. The first step in achieving mutual
recognition is for the countries involved to agree on a common basis of
principles, and the IOSCO principles provide such a basis, Diplock feels.
There have been a number of noteworthy mutual
recognition steps recently. She highlighted the memorandum of understanding in
2006 between the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the U.K.
Financial Services Authority (recently updated). A number of similar agreements
exist within the European Union. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
announced in March a series of actions to further mutual recognition with a
number of countries, including Australia, Canada and the EU. In August the SEC
signed a mutual recognition agreement with Australia, which provides a framework
for regulators in both countries to consider exemptions that would permit
exchanges and broker dealers to operate in both jurisdictions, without the need
in certain aspects for separate regulation by both countries. Diplock noted that
processes are underway for similar agreements between the U.S. and both Canada
and the EU. Australia and New Zealand recently introduced mutual recognition of
securities offerings.
In the Asia-Pacific region, IOSCO is working on an
opt-in scheme for mutual recognition of general/non-specialized collective
investment schemes offered to non-retail investors. Diplock called this an
important first step to possible wider arrangements. She noted that all the
arrangements are based on an understanding of the importance of local regulation
and cooperation between regulators.
While applauding the work toward a single set of
Int'l. Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), she is concerned that
the progress will be reduced if different interpretations of IFRS spring up
around the world. IOSCO has stated that national variations must be clearly
disclosed, and Diplock believes more work is needed to ensure the sharing of
views on IFRS. She also applauded recent efforts in the U.S. to work toward the
use of IFRS by U.S. issuers beginning in 2014.
|