|
|
(The news
featured below is a selection from the news covered in the Federal Securities
Report Letter, which is distributed to subscribers of the Federal
Securities Law Reports.)
Federal Reserve Official
Addresses Corporate Governance, Disclosure
According to New York Federal
Reserve Board President William J. McDonough, the three main ingredients of good
corporate governance are capable officers and directors, a coherent strategy and
business plan, and clear lines of responsibility and accountability. In
addition, he said that execution of the overall objectives of the firm must be
supported by rigorous internal controls and effective risk management. In
remarks at the William Taylor Memorial Lecture in Washington, he also called for
a major rethinking of the entire disclosure framework.
In his view, effective risk
management is based on a foundation of good corporate governance and rigorous
internal controls. While taking calculated risks is part of any business
enterprise, he acknowledged, it is also necessary that each firm be able to
identify the risks associated with its activities and effectively measure,
monitor, and control them. An effective risk management and control structure is
not sufficient, however, if it is not accompanied by an institutional culture
that ensures that written policies and procedures are actually translated into
practice.
In turn, he continued, an
effective internal control apparatus is critical to provide reasonable assurance
that the information produced by the organization is timely and reliable and
that errors and irregularities are discovered and corrected promptly. Such an
apparatus is also needed to promote the firm's operational efficiency and to
ensure compliance with managerial policies, laws, regulations, and sound
fiduciary principles. Finally on this point, Mr. McDonough said it is vital that
managers make certain that their commitment to an environment that includes
effective risk management and rigorous controls filters fully down the line to
all employees.
The Federal Reserve president also
postulated that effective market discipline must be supported by meaningful
public disclosure and sound accounting standards. Knowing a company's appetite
for risk and its approach to managing risk is essential to understanding the
risks of being a shareholder, a creditor, or a counterparty. In this regard, he
sees a need for dramatic progress in improving disclosure practices, adding that
a full appreciation of risk cannot be achieved without sufficient information.
Progress on the disclosure front,
however, will be limited until accounting standards are enhanced to ensure
proper valuation and to reflect innovations over the past decade, in terms of
both new products and modern risk management techniques. Accounting systems
serve a variety of purposes, he opined, but the most important is helping
creditors and investors make informed decisions as to which enterprises meet the
market tests of efficiency, competitiveness, and profitability.
On the question of independent
directors, which is crucial to corporate governance, the Federal Reserve
official noted that finding such outside directors can involve a dificult
balancing act. Directors who are paid too little or who are kept at the
perimeter of the corporate structure may be truly independent but have little
incentive or insufficient knowledge about the organization to govern
effectively. By contrast, directors who are paid well or who are fully
integrated into the corporate structure may have the incentive and the knowledge
to govern effectively but lack the desired independence to discipline
incompetent or dishonest management.
The risk is that as the pay of
outside directors increases their independence may wane and, instead of being
watchdogs for shareholders, they may increasingly function as lapdogs for
management. Thus, Mr. McDonough sees a great challenge in getting the right
balance of expertise and independence so that the board does not rubberstamp
management decisions. Given what has transpired over this past year, he said
there may be a need to reconceive the role of directors. In this regard, he
noted that some firms are already moving away from the tradition of choosing the
CEO of another company as a director to choosing people who are equipped with
more specialized and technical knowledge.
|
|
|
|