(The news featured
below is a selection from the news covered in SEC Today, which is distributed to
subscribers of SEC
Today.)
Gadziala Details Challenges Facing International Financial Institutions
The proliferation of complex new products, such as credit
derivatives, creates challenges to financial institutions on many levels,
including risk management and clearing and settlement, according to Mary Ann
Gadziala, the associate director of the SEC's Office of Compliance Inspections
and Examinations. Referencing the recent interagency statement on complex
financial transactions and an earlier paper on sound practices, she discussed
the risks facing international financial institutions at a seminar hosted by the
Institute of International Bankers.
Gadziala believes that it is important for financial
institutions to maintain effective compliance and risk management systems. For
example, given the dynamic markets where new products are proliferating, firms
should ensure that back office operations and compliance keep pace with sales
and marketing of all new products, she said. A particular area of focus is
assignments and confirmations with respect to the credit derivatives market.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association reports
that the credit derivatives market has more than doubled in the past year to
approximately $26 trillion in notional terms. Any market of that size, she said,
should be very carefully risk managed. In addition, the credit derivatives
market is relatively new and has not been tested in a severe stress environment.
She said that processing issues related to equity derivatives, collateralized
mortgage obligations and asset-backed securities should also be monitored.
Another area that requires constant vigilance is anti-money
laundering compliance, Gadziala said. This is not only because of its critical
importance in combating terrorist financing and illegal money laundering, but
because compliance must try to stay one step ahead of clever criminals, she
said.
As financial derivatives and asset-backed securities have
gone from somewhat esoteric instruments to a central feature of the markets, the
SEC and the federal banking regulators have developed guidance for banks and
securities firms that engage in complex structured transactions. The agencies
recently issued revised interagency guidance on managing the risk of derivatives
and other instruments issued in connection with the complex transactions.
Broadly, the SEC and the banking agencies continue to believe that it is
important for financial institutions engaged in complex structured transactions
to design procedures effectively managing the associated risks.
Gadziala noted that the interagency statement describes the
types of risk management principles the SEC and banking agencies believe may
help a financial institution to identify complex structured finance transactions
that may pose heightened legal or reputational risks to the institution and to
evaluate and manage these risks within the institution's internal control
framework. The main areas covered are due diligence, documentation, general
business ethics, monitoring compliance, audit and reporting.
The statement covers U.S. branches and agencies of foreign
banks supervised by U.S. bank regulators. Gadziala advised foreign branches and
agencies to coordinate their policies with the foreign bank's group-wide
policies developed in accordance with the rules of the foreign bank's home
country regulators.
The statement also recognizes that a financial institution
operating in foreign jurisdictions may tailor its policies and procedures, as
appropriate, to account for, and comply with, the laws and regulations of those
foreign jurisdictions. The comment period on the proposed revised statement has
expired, and the SEC and banking agencies are considering whether any additional
revisions may be necessary in light of the comments, she said.
The earlier sound practices white paper contains specific
guidance with respect to significant domestic and international firms for
identifying clearing and settlement activities in support of critical financial
markets and maintaining sufficiently geographically dispersed resources to meet
recovery and resumption objectives. The white paper also lists basic business
continuity objectives applicable to all firms.
While the sound practices white paper does not address the
recovery or resumption of trading operations or retail financial services,
Gadziala noted, in 2003 the SEC issued a policy statement on business continuity
planning stating that SROs and ECNs should prepare for the timely resumption of
trading in the event of wide-scale disruptions. The agency also specified
principles to be applied for business continuity planning.
The SEC also stated that the establishment of a
next-business day resumption goal for the SROs and the ECNs should serve as a
useful resumption benchmark for securities firms as well, recognizing that this
is essentially a matter of business judgment. In Gadziala's view, this
highlights the fact that business continuity planning remains one of the most
critical aspects of risk management.
James Hamilton
|