(The news featured
below is a selection from the news covered in SEC Today, which is distributed to
subscribers of SEC
Today.)
Nazareth Outlines SEC's Recent Steps To Accommodate Foreign Issuers
The SEC has made a concerted effort recently to address
regulatory conflicts in cross-border transactions, according to SEC Commissioner
Annette Nazareth, and may take further steps at an early December open meeting.
At that meeting, the Commission will consider issuing guidance to management
regarding Sarbanes-Oxley section 404, and will address final rules relating to
the deregistration of foreign private issuers. Nazareth spoke at the UCLA law
institute on corporate aspects of M&A, and her remarks are posted on the
SEC's Web site.
She said that the Commission has been sensitive to the
special circumstances of foreign companies for many years, as evidenced by the
several accommodations made in the implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Those included allowing non-management employees to serve as audit committee
members and shareholders to select or ratify the selection of auditors, she
said, and extensions of the section 404 compliance date for certain foreign
private issuers.
More recently, Nazareth noted, the amendments to the tender
offer best price rule included special arrangements for foreign private issuers.
In general, the tender offer best price rule amendments clarify that the rule
applies only to the consideration paid for securities tendered in a tender
offer, and exempt from the rule compensation received pursuant to employee
benefit arrangements. The amendments also provide a safe harbor for arrangements
that are approved by independent directors.
In recognition of the special circumstances of foreign
private issuers, she said, the amendments provide that foreign private issuers
may obtain approval for purposes of the safe harbor by any and all members of
the board, or any committee of the board authorized to approve the arrangement,
according the laws or regulations of their home countries.
Foreign private issuers also may rely on the independence
requirements of the laws, regulations, codes, or standards of their home
countries when determining the independence of the directors approving the
arrangements, she noted. Nazareth strongly supported the amendments to the best
price rule, and is pleased that foreign companies were given the flexibility to
rely on their home country standards.
Another important area where the SEC is working to address
the conflicts in international regulatory standards, according to Nazareth,
relates to the proposed consolidation of transatlantic financial markets. With
regard to the proposed NYSE/Euronext merger, she believes that fears that
European issuers will become subject to U.S. laws because of the merger are
unwarranted. Built into the transaction, she said, is the idea that multiple
regulatory structures would apply.
This was confirmed in late September when SEC Chairman
Christopher Cox and a committee of Euronext regulators met in Lisbon to discuss
the potential merger. She noted that the participants affirmed that joint
ownership or affiliation of markets alone would not lead to regulation from one
jurisdiction becoming applicable in the other, and also reiterated their shared
belief in the importance of local regulation of local markets.
Nazareth also discussed that SEC's participation in the
International Organization of Securities Commissions ("IOSCO"), and
how that organization's efforts had a direct impact on the recently enacted
Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006.
In 2003, IOSCO formed a task force chaired by the SEC to
develop international principles relating to credit rating agencies. That task
force helped to develop the "IOSCO Statement of Principles Regarding the
Activities of Credit Rating Agencies," which sets forth high level
objectives designed to improve the quality, integrity and transparency of the
credit-rating process. Nazareth noted that the principles apply to all credit
rating agencies, regardless of their size or jurisdiction in which they operate.
A year later, the SEC helped IOSCO write a code of conduct
for credit rating agencies to help them put the 2003 principles into practice.
Nazareth said that the provisions of the code of conduct influenced the drafting
of the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act. Much of the information that credit
rating agencies need to furnish to the Commission when they apply to become
registered, she noted, is entirely consistent with the fundamental provisions of
the IOSCO code. It is clear, she said, that the new U.S. law was influenced by,
and is largely a reflection of, international standards that have now been
embraced by many jurisdictions.
John Filar Atwood
|