(The news featured
below is a selection from the news covered in Federal Securities Law Reporter,
which is distributed to subscribers of Federal
Securities Law Reporter.)
Claims of Improper Accounting By Restaurant Chain Dismissed
A securities fraud class action alleging that a restaurant
chain and its officers violated Exchange Act Sections 10(b) and 20(a) was
dismissed with leave to replead. The class claimed that the company and its
officers artificially inflated the company's stock price through a series of
earnings restatements resulting from alleged GAAP violations and material
misrepresentations. The class also claimed that the company misrepresented that
its internal controls were adequate and reliable.
The court (DC Minn) disagreed, holding that the class
failed to meet the heightened pleading standards of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act. Specifically, the court held that the class allegations
that the officers' directions to treat free employee meals as sales to increase
revenues, and other GAAP violations failed to show scienter because the class
did not show that the officers knew that the actions were fraudulent at the time
of occurrence. Additionally, the court held that the class failed to prove loss
causation because they failed to identify how a series of partial disclosure of
the alleged fraud that was connected to the stock's price decline. Because the
class failed to prove a primary violation of Section 10(b), the court also
dismissed its Section 20(a) control person claim.
In re Buca Inc. Securities Litigation (DC Minn) is
reported at ¶94,107.
|