(The news featured
below is a selection from the news covered in SEC Today, which is distributed to
subscribers of SEC
Today.)
ABA Meeting Features Dialogue With Director of Corporation Finance
Representatives of the SEC and the PCAOB last week spoke at
the ABA Section of Business Law's fall meeting, which included a dialogue with
John White, the director of the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance. White
reviewed current developments in the Division, including the agenda items for
the upcoming meeting on December 13. Looking back on its 2006 activities, White
said it will be apparent that the SEC covered a lot of ground, but admitted it
is a "little back-loaded" with the December meetings.
The SEC issued a press release in October outlining the
matters to be addressed at the December 13 open meeting. The formal agenda for
the meeting will be published on December 6. White said the comment letters
submitted in response to the concept release on management's reports on internal
control over financial reporting were very detailed and very helpful. He noted
that one of the amendments to the PCAOB's Auditing Standard No. 2 will remove
all of the guidance for management since the SEC has taken that issue back. The
format may include both interpretive guidance and rules, he said, but the
"guts" of the release will be interpretive.
Companies will not have to comply with the interpretive
guidance, according to White. They can continue to follow the processes that
they established since they began to comply with the management's assessment
requirement of section 404 in 2003. The goal for the management guidance release
is to have it proposed and adopted for companies to use in 2007. The PCAOB has
the same goal with respect to the amendments to AS2.
White said he hopes for a final release soon on the
proposal to postpone compliance with section 404 for nonaccelerated filers. The
final rule is likely to be adopted by seriatim, he said. If the SEC has not
finalized its guidance for management and the PCAOB has not adopted revisions to
AS2, White said the SEC likely will delay the compliance date again.
The comments submitted in response to the foreign
deregistration rule proposal recommended a number of revisions that are fairly
easy to accommodate, according to White, such as the dormancy period, the
reporting period and the primary trading market. The principal issue with which
the staff continues to wrestle is the threshold for U.S. holders. The staff is
looking at different ways to reset the threshold at a higher number, he said.
White added that the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation issued a number of
recommendations last week that have given the staff more to think about.
The staff received a lot of comments in response to its
proposal on electronic proxies, known as the "notice and access"
model. There were a number of objections to the proposal, including concerns
about access by seniors. White said the staff also concluded that the post card
format, as originally proposed, will not work since shareholders will receive a
control number that must be kept private. He said the staff has also come up
with a workable answer for delivering the ballot along with the proxy. If
adopted, White said the rules will not be effective for this proxy season
because intermediaries will need time to adapt their systems.
The shareholder proxy access issue is highly charged,
according to White. Under 1934 Act rule 14a-8(i)(8), known as the election
exclusion, companies may omit from their proxy materials any shareholder
proposal that relates to a campaign for election as a director. White said the
staff has not read the rule broadly and most proposals go into the proxy, except
for those relating to director nominees and the process for conducting future
elections.
White said his first official act upon joining the SEC was
to submit the SEC's views to the Second Circuit in AFSCME v. AIG, which failed
to convince the court. Until the SEC clarifies its interpretation, White said
that proposals relating to the election process for companies under the Second
Circuit's jurisdiction may be included in the proxy. The SEC is not happy about
having an inconsistent national application of the rule, he said. He added that
there has been a constant stream of visitors to the SEC to promote their
positions on the matter.
If three out of five of the commissioners agree that the
current staff position should be reaffirmed, White said the staff could continue
issuing no-action letters saying that none of these election proposals, some of
which are awaiting staff action, go into the proxy statement. He also noted that
a proposal known as the Donaldson compromise on proposed rule 14a-11 is still
"out there." He suggested that interested parties read the agenda for
the meeting very carefully.
The staff continues to work on a proposal that has been
referred to as the "Katie Couric" rule, which relates to the
disclosure of the pay of the three most highly compensated company employees who
are not named executives. If the SEC wants to take action in time for the 2007
proxy season, White said there is still time to do that since all that is needed
is a final rule. The Division plans to review the implementation of the other
executive compensation rules after April or May to see if they require any
fixes.
The foreign private issuers that have adopted international
financial reporting standards filed their Forms 20-F in July, White said, and
are undergoing staff reviews. White said the comment letters relating to IFRS
are the same as the staff always issues, and reflect the same kinds of questions
about the financials.
White said that former director Alan Beller's idea to post
the comment letters online was a brilliant idea, except that, at the time, EDGAR
could not accommodate the move. Now that EDGAR has been revamped to permit the
posting of the letters, White said there are 7,000 sets of correspondence
available. The public posting of the letters puts pressure on the staff and on
companies to write good comment letters, he added.
White mentioned the SEC's initiatives relating to XBRL. Do
not assume the use of XBRL will remain voluntary, he warned.
In closing, White said the Division plans to review how it
communicates interpretive information such as frequently asked questions,
current issues outlines, the telephone interpretation manual, staff legal
bulletins and staff alerts. There has to be a better way, in his view. White
said the information that is posted on the Division's Web site is not
up-to-date. The staff needs a mechanism to update little pieces rather than an
entire interpretive document, he said. He asked for input on the best way to
accomplish this task and whether users want the Division to retain the
out-of-date material or get rid of it.
Jacquelyn Lumb
|