|
|
(The news
featured below is a selection from the news covered in the Federal Securities
Report Letter, which is distributed to subscribers of the Federal
Securities Law Reports.)
SEC Chief Accountant Views Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board
The new Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board established by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is working on an operating
plan to implement its mandate, noted Jackson Day, acting SEC chief accountant.
With regard to standard setting, the first question is whether the board will
set its own standards or adopt standards recommended by an advisory group.
Regardless of that decision, noted Mr. Day, the SEC must approve any new rules
that are issued. He spoke before the New York State Society of Certified Public
Accountants.
In his view, implementation of a
quality inspection program may be the oversight board's most important
challenge. While the Sarbanes-Oxley Act provides that the largest firms must be
inspected each year and other firms every third year, the board must decide how
many partners will be reviewed each time the firm is reviewed, what functions
will be reviewed, and whether risk will be a determinate in answering those
questions. The board also must also consider the effects of its timing in light
of the seasonality of the auditing business.
There is also the question of who will
perform the inspections. The oversight board must determine if it will perform
all inspections or contract some of them out, said the chief accountant, and
what effect the required internal inspections should have on their work. They
also must address the issue of resources and how to get the expertise necessary
to address issues such as computer auditing, independence, client acceptance and
continuance, technical accounting consultations, and auditing fair value
estimates.
While the Sarbanes-Oxley Act provides
the oversight board with substantial disciplinary powers related to misconduct
of accountants, continued Mr. Day, it is intended that the board's disciplinary
powers will complement, not replace, the SEC enforcement division's efforts.
Thus, issues such as interaction with the Commission, and what remedial actions
to take to promote higher quality audits, must be addressed.
Under the act, registrants will fund
both the oversight board and the FASB. And, in the case of the oversight board,
noted the SEC official, the accountants and the accounting firms that serve
public companies will chip in too. Mr. Day emphasized that the Commission and
its staff will continue to oversee the FASB. The FASB will not be under the
umbrella of the oversight board, he assured, even though registrants ultimately
may receive a single bill for the funding of the two operations.
|
|
|
|