|
|
(The news featured
below is a selection from the news covered in SEC Today, which is distributed to
subscribers of SEC
Today.)
Nazareth
Reviews Possible Reg. NMS Guidance
Annette Nazareth, director of the SEC's Division of Market
Regulation, acknowledged the delay in the release of Regulation NMS, which was
adopted April 6, but said that it contains no surprises. The few changes that
will be included in the release, which largely reflects the reproposal of
December 2004, were made to accommodate requests for additional flexibility or
to make the meanings more clear, according to
Nazareth
. In the prepared text of her May 20 speech before the SIA market structure
conference,
Nazareth
reviewed the areas in which the SEC is likely to issue additional guidance on
the implementation of Regulation NMS.
Regulation NMS was subject to vigorous disagreement and debate,
Nazareth
noted, but given its complexity and the various interests affected by the
reform measures, a consensus was not expected. Some urged the SEC to repropose
the rules a second time before adoption, but the Commission concluded that five
years of debate was long enough. The Commission adopted Regulation NMS to
provide regulatory certainty in the equity markets.
Nazareth
said the recently announced market consolidations reflect the need to maximize
economies of scale, reduce excess capacity and respond to the demand for more
automated trading at the NYSE.
The application of the order protection rule across all
markets gained a great deal of attention, according to
Nazareth
. She said the market consolidations demonstrate the rationale underlying
Regulation NMS. By leveling the playing field across markets, they now compete
directly under rules requiring best price, open access and transparency.
Nazareth denied rumors that the delay in the release of
Regulation NMS was based on the intention, through rule text or staff action, to
limit or discourage the number of new electronic communications networks or
alternative trading system entrants into the marketplace. She said the rumor was
preposterous. She also quashed rumors that certain ATSs, such as Liquidnet, were
exempted from the order protection rule in the final release. Liquidnet
requested an exemption from the 5% fair access standard since it does not
publish quotations, she explained. The SEC recognizes the logic of the request
and will consider the exemption request during the implementation period for any
entity that operates as an electronic block trading desk and does not
disseminate public quotations, she advised.
Nazareth
also has gotten calls from those who believed that the final order protection
rule was revised to require the protection of reserve size. Imagine mandating
the protection of an order you cannot see, she said, in denying that rumor as
well.
The implementation of Regulation NMS will require
securities industry input,
Nazareth
said. She anticipates working closely with industry participants and groups
during the implementation process. As key issues surface during this process,
Nazareth
said the SEC will provide interpretive guidance, as warranted, on issues that
are likely to arise, such as questions concerning automated markets and
automated quotations. For instance, the staff may issue guidance to the industry
that a trading center does not qualify as automated, she explained, which would
provide other trading centers with the ability to bypass the nonautomated
trading center for purposes of the order protection rule.
Nazareth
also expects questions to arise with respect to the policies and procedures
necessary to comply with the order protection rule. The SEC will likely provide
industry-wide guidance, she said, but all trading centers will not be expected
to have identical policies and procedures. Another area that may require
guidance relates to surveillance procedures. She said the input of industry
participants will be beneficial in determining the frequency and scope of the
required surveillance procedures.
The policies and procedures for block positioners, as well
as hybrid markets, will have to address the standards for manual executions as
well as fully automated trading, according to
Nazareth
. She explained that, to take advantage of the intermarket sweep exception to
the order protection rule, trading centers will have to automate their execution
process so that at the time the order is executed, the systems evaluate the
existing protected quotations and route the orders accordingly. The time of
execution should be recorded separately from the trade reporting time, if they
differ, she said.
The staff also is likely to provide guidance to trading
centers as they develop standards for implementing the self-help exception,
according to
Nazareth
. Prior to providing the guidance, however, she said it would be helpful to
discuss with the industry the problems they currently experience and how they
are resolved.
Nazareth
also predicted that there will be questions about the scope of the benchmark
exception to the order protection rule and advised that industry input will be
essential before granting exceptions.
The overarching duty of best execution will continue,
Nazareth
advised. She expects the release to state that, when trading in a stock is
largely automated, a broker can reasonably determine to bypass manual quotes of
a nonprimary market if its experience has demonstrated that an attempt to access
the market would not be in its customers' best interests. There is much to do,
she observed, and only a year to get it all done before the implementation date.
|
|
|
|