(The news
featured below is a selection from the news covered in the Federal Securities
Report Letter, which is distributed to subscribers of the Federal
Securities Law Reports.)
House Leaders Ask SEC to Adopt
Mutual Fund Reform Rules
House Financial Services Committee
Chairman Michael Oxley and Capital Markets Subcommittee Chairman Richard Baker
have requested the SEC to use its regulatory authority to implement provisions
of their mutual fund reform bill that do not require legislative action. In a
letter to SEC Chairman William Donaldson, Reps. Oxley and Baker asked the
Commission to conduct rulemaking, as quickly as possible, to increase the
transparency of mutual fund fees and costs and strengthen corporate governance
and management integrity at fund companies. The legislators requested a progress
report from the SEC on the rulemaking initiatives by October 1, 2003.
Last month, the Financial Services
Committee approved the bill, Mutual Funds Integrity and Fee Transparency Act,
H.R.2420, which would increase the level of mutual fund transparency and import
Sarbanes-Oxley Act-type corporate governance reforms into the investment company
industry.
The House leaders want the SEC to
issue rules improving mutual fund fee and expense disclosures, including the
estimated amount, in dollars for each $1,000 of investment in the fund, of the
operating expenses that are borne by shareholders. The rules should also require
disclosure of the structure of the portfolio manager's compensation and the
portfolio turnover rate, as well as information on the fund's soft dollar,
directed brokerage, and revenue sharing arrangements. In addition, the lawmakers
want disclosure about breakpoint discounts.
Similarly, they want SEC rules
requiring the adviser to submit an annual report to the fund's board detailing
soft dollar, directed brokerage, and revenue sharing arrangements; and, in turn,
the board should be subjected to fiduciary duty to review such arrangements.
The SEC should further augment
fund governance by decreasing the maximum number of directors who may be
interested persons from 60 percent to one-third of the board. Also, the
legislators want the SEC to require funds to inform their directors of
significant deficiencies identified by the Commission.
Finally, remarking on recent proxy
reform measures under SEC consideration, the congressmen asked the Commission to
indicate how it intends to ensure that mutual fund shareholders are given the
same rights as other corporate shareholders as the rulemaking process evolves.
This concern evidences a sense of the committee that funds should not be treated
differently from other companies.
|