(The news
featured below is a selection from the news covered in SEC Today, which is distributed to subscribers of
SEC Today.)
PCAOB Issues First Inspection Reports
The PCAOB has issued reports on
the limited inspections it conducted of the Big Four
accounting firms in 2003. PCAOB Chairman William McDonough
emphasized the benefits of the process rather than the audit
and accounting problems that were revealed. SEC Chief
Accountant Donald Nicolaisen issued a statement expressing
disappointment in the PCAOB's findings, but adding that this
first inspection report covered a period in which the firms
were undergoing significant changes. The reports' emphasis
on criticisms do not reflect a broad negative assessment of
the firms' audit practices, according to McDonough. He
lauded the firms' cooperation with the staff inspections
with the goal of removing any impediments to the highest
quality audit performance. McDonough noted in a news
conference that Congress did a wise thing in creating the
PCAOB.
Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, no
portions of the inspection reports that deal with criticisms
or defects in firms' quality control systems can be made
public if they are satisfactorily addressed by the firm
within 12 months. McDonough believes the confidentiality
provision is a good thing. He said it imposes a form of
discipline on firms, which he believes the drafters
intended. Based on this limitation, the Board decided that
the public portion of the inspection reports will not
include any discussion of the firms' quality control
systems. Any criticisms or defects cannot be discussed, so
it may create a distorted or misleading impression, in the
Board's view.
McDonough was asked the reason for
the length of time it took to issue the inspection reports,
given that the inspections took place between June and
December 2003. He said the delay had a lot to do with him.
It was important to get it right, McDonough said, and
additional time was taken to improve the quality of the
reports. The PCAOB is conducting 2004 inspections now, he
added, and they will be rolled out as they are completed.
The 2003 reports were a one-time event in which the PCAOB
released all of the reports together for a previous year.
The reports include descriptions
of the matters on which the staff focused during the
inspections and of the issues identified in reviewing the
firms' performance on selected audit engagements. The PCAOB
advised in a news release that any descriptions of
departures from professional standards are not the result of
an adversarial adjudicative process and do not constitute
conclusive findings of fact or violations for purposes of
imposing legal liability.
While inspecting one of the Big
Four firms, the staff discovered an engagement where the
requirements of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 95-22 were
not appropriately applied. The provisions relate to the
balance sheet classification of borrowings outstanding under
revolving credit agreements that include both a subjective
acceleration clause and a lock-box arrangement. The staff
then searched public databases to identify companies that
may have had the same problem with improper application of
EITF 95-22 in their financial statements. It uncovered
problems in that area in engagements conducted by all of the
Big Four accounting firms, and the companies that were
identified issued restatements.
Ernst & Young LLP has issued
an alert to its partners and staff to reemphasize the firm's
guidance with respect to EITF 95-22. Deloitte & Touche
LLP said that it is evaluating a process to prevent a
recurrence and will modify its audit procedures and
implement training once its evaluation is complete. KPMG LLP
surveyed its issuer clients to determine whether others were
misapplying EITF 95-22. It identified additional situations
where the standard was misapplied and has issued technical
guidance and practice aids to assist its professionals in
meeting the criteria of EITF 95-22. PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLC issued a practice alert with respect to EITF 95-22 and
advised partners to consult with a subject matter expert in
the national office whenever a client's revolving debt
facility includes a lock-box feature.
Each of the firms' responses to
their inspection reports were included. Among Deloitte &
Touche's comments was a response to the documentation
deficiencies the staff found in some of its engagements.
Documentation is one of the most difficult challenges in the
audit process, according to Deloitte & Touche. The firm
is actively reviewing and revising its documentation
policies and procedures to address the new PCAOB standards.
However, the firm added that the emphasis on documentation
should not come at the expense of improvement in the
substance of the audit process.
Ernst & Young outlined a
number of disagreements with the staff's conclusions about
certain matters that departed from PCAOB standards or from
E&Y's quality control policies. KPMG noted that in one
engagement, the firm and the PCAOB did not agree on the
appropriate generally accepted accounting principles and
turned to the SEC for guidance. The SEC agreed with KPMG on
the matter raised by the PCAOB, but questioned a different
element of the treatment that ultimately required
restatement by the issuer. Three knowledgeable, informed
bodies reviewed the facts and reached different conclusions,
according to the firm, which illustrates the complex
accounting issues that registrants, auditors and regulators
face.
The PCAOB advised in its news
release that the inspections would provide a foundation for
full-scale inspections and a baseline understanding of the
firms' internal systems of quality control over auditing.
PricewaterhouseCoopers wrote, however, that there was no
baseline assessment of its audit quality, which was the
Board's stated objective for the 2003 inspection procedures.
Nicolaisen, in his news release,
said that he hoped the firms will take the findings
seriously and will make a concerted commitment to improve
their audit quality over the long term. He believes the
PCAOB's process will lead to a sea change for the profession
as it adapts to its newly regulated environment.
|