|
From
the editors of Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, this update describes
important developments from CCH products liability and safety publications.
If you have any comments or suggestions concerning
the information provided or the format used, we'd like to hear from you.
Please send your comments to pamela.maloney@wolterskluwer.
Products Liability
Inconsistent ATV Defect Verdicts Mandated
New Trial
Inconsistent verdicts concerning
the negligence of a vehicle manufacturer and the defectiveness of its
product mandated a new trial, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit determined. An all-terrain vehicle (ATV) owner was left paraplegic
when his ATV flipped over while loading it onto a trailer. The ATV owner
brought negligent design and failure-to-warn claims against the ATV's
manufacturer, resulting in a $2.2 million damage award. The court determined
that the jury's verdicts were inconsistent and that a new trial should
be granted, reasoning that a verdict of negligent conduct without a resulting
defective product undermined the causal connection between the negligence
and the product-related injury (Kosmynka v. Polaris Indus., Inc.,
2d Cir., CCH Products Liability Reports ¶17,532).
Medicaid/Medicare Liens Addressed in
Zyprexa Mass Tort Context
A series of agreements were
reached among a group of 8,000 Zyprexa plaintiffs, the federal government,
and 23 states to resolve outstanding Medicare and Medicaid liens on the
plaintiffs’ recovery from their product claims involving the antipsychotic
drug. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, which
oversaw the lien agreement, praised the use of a statistical model in
place of case-by-case reviews to determine the amount of each lien. In
addition, the court mandated that each state reduce its lien based on
the plaintiffs’ legal costs (In re Zypreza Prods. Liab. Litig.,
ED N.Y., CCH Products Liability Reports ¶17,534).
High Economic/Non-Economic Award Ratio
Irrelevant to Reduction of Damages Issue
The high ratio between an injured
worker's economic damages and non-economic damages was not, by itself,
sufficient to justify remittitur of a jury's award a Missouri appeals
court ruled. A worker was seriously injured when the battery of the front-end
loader that he was operating exploded due to a defect in its battery.
The manufacturer of the machine appealed the jury's $2.5 million compensatory
award, arguing that the ratio between the award and the worker’s
$14,530.31 economic damage award was excessive. The court held that the
ratio was irrelevant and that, as long as, the total award was justified
by the worker’s injury it was not excessive (Knifong v. Caterpillar,
Inc., Mo. Ct. App., CCH Products Liability Reports ¶17,538).
Consumer Product Safety
Electronic Stability Control Standard
Proposed
A proposal to establish a new
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard would require all manufacturers
to equip passenger cars and other vehicles with electronic stability control
(ESC) as a standard feature. ESC systems use automatic computer-controlled
braking of individual wheels to help drivers maintain control in situations
where vehicles without ESC would skid out of control and likely leave
the road—the circumstances that lead to most rollovers. Based on
crash data studies conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA), installation of ESC systems would reduce single vehicle crashes
of passenger cars by an estimated 34 percent and single vehicle crashes
of sport utility vehicles by an estimated 59 percent. NHTSA believes that
ESC systems thus present the highest life-saving potential of any vehicle
safety device developed in the past three decades (CCH Consumer
Product Safety Guide ¶40,700).
Safety Ratings Required on New Car
Window Stickers
Manufacturers will be required
to display the government's safety ratings on new vehicles beginning with
the 2008 model year, under a final rule issued by the NHTSA. The rule
requires window stickers to provide safety rating information about the
vehicles, in order that consumers can evaluate the vehicles' safety based
upon the number of stars on the sticker. The new vehicle price stickers
will contain NHTSA safety ratings in three areas—front and side
crash tests and non-destructive rollover tests. Each test uses the five-star
rating system, with five stars indicating the greatest safety. If a vehicle
has not been tested by the agency or safety ratings have not been assigned,
a statement to that effect in the appropriate rating category must be
included. Finally, ratings must be placed on new vehicles manufactured
30 or more days after notification to the manufacturer by NHTSA of ratings
for those vehicles (CCH Consumer Product Safety Guide ¶41,951).
CPSC Launches Major Campaign to Reduct
ATV-Related Injuries
The Consumer Product Safety Commission announced a major campaign
to education riders of all ages on the safe use of ATVs using television
and radio messages; a website for riders, parents, trainers, local and
state officials and the media; and a partnership with organizations and
officials dedicated to promoting ATV safety. According to the CPSC, from
1982 to 2004, there were nearly 6,500 deaths involving ATVs. In 2004 alone,
an estimated 136,000 people were treated in hospital emergency rooms for
ATV-related injuries. About 30 percent of all deaths and injuries involve
children younger than age 16. (CCH Consumer Product Safety Guide,
No. 876, Oct. 6, 2006).
|