|
From the editors of CCH Federal Securities Law Reporter, CCH Blue
Sky Law Reporter and the securities publications of Aspen Publishers,
this update describes important developments covered in these publications,
as well as timely topics of interest generally to federal and state securities
practitioners.
If you have questions or comments concerning
the information provided below, please contact me at elena.eyber@wolterskluwer.com.
CCH Federal Securities
Law Reporter
SEC Adopts Regulation R to Implement
Bank Broker Provisions
The SEC unanimously approved Regulation R, which implements the bank broker
provisions of the Exchange Act. Banks will have an 18-month transitional
exemption before complying with Regulation R. The regulation was developed
jointly with the Federal Reserve Board. Release Nos. 34-56501 and 34-56502
will be published in Report 2296 at ¶87,950 and ¶87,951.
Temporary Rule Adopted in Response
to Court Decision
The SEC adopted a temporary rule in response to the DC Circuit’s
opinion in Financial Planning Association v. SEC (¶94,185). Under
temporary rule 206(3)-3T, advisers would be in compliance with Advisers
Act Section 206(3) with respect to nondiscretionary advisory accounts
if they provide written prospective disclosure about any conflicts that
may arise from principal trades. They must obtain written, revocable consents
from their clients authorizing them to enter into principal transactions
and make certain disclosures prior to each principal transaction. The
SEC also proposed amendments to reinstate three interpretive positions
of the rule that were vacated by the court. Release Nos. IA-2653 and IA-2652
will be published in Report 2296 at ¶87,953 and ¶87,952.
Commission Approves FINRA Rule on Deferred
Variable Annuities
The SEC approved a new Financial Industry Regulatory Authority rule that
is intended to enhance broker-dealer sales practices with respect to purchases
and exchanges of deferred variable annuities. The SEC also issued an exemptive
order allowing FINRA members to hold customer funds for no more than seven
business days while completing the required principal review under the
new rule without becoming fully subject to Exchange Act Rule 15c3-3 and
being required to maintain higher levels of net capital in accordance
with Rule 15c3-1. Release Nos. 34-56375 and 34-56376 are published at
¶87,947
(ip
access user) and ¶87,948
(ip
access user).
SRO Did Not Have Absolute Immunity
A national securities exchange and self-regulatory organization did not
have absolute immunity from issued advertisements touting stock in specific
companies in order to increase trading volume. In an en banc opinion,
the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that because the advertisements
were made to serve the organizations' own business by enticing investors
to buy stock listed on its exchange, the advertisements did not fall under
the organizations' delegated disciplinary or regulatory authority pursuant
to the Exchange Act. Weissman v. National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. (11thCir) is reported at ¶94,384
(ip
access user).
5th Circuit Interprets Fraud Pleading
Ruling
Interpreting the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling on scienter pleading
in a securities fraud class action (Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues
& Rights, Ltd., ¶94,335
(ip
access user)), a 5th Circuit panel rejected a reading that would allow
the drawing of a strong inference of scienter from the fact that the senior
executive and financial officers signed a Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302
certification. Investors were unable to explain the link between the certification
statement concerning internal controls and the actual accounting and reporting
problems. Investors filed a securities fraud class action against the
company, its CEO and two CFOs who served at different times. They alleged
that a number of false statements by the company regarding its financial
condition caused an artificial inflation in the market price of the company's
securities. Under Section 302, the senior executive and financial officers
have to sign the certification. The appeals court rejected a reading of
Tellabs that would allow a strong inference of scienter from the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act certification alone. If this interpretation were accepted, the court
said that scienter would be established in every case where there was
an accounting error or an auditing mistake made by a publicly traded company,
which would eviscerate the pleading requirements for scienter set forth
in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Central Laborers'
Pension Fund v. Integrated Electrical Services, Inc. is reported
at ¶94,378
(ip
access user).
CCH Blue Sky Law Reporter
CALIFORNIA Proposes Amendments to Investment
Adviser IARD, Advertising Custody, Recordkeeping and Unethical Practice
Rules
Investment adviser rules requiring Form ADV to be filed with the IARD
and involving advertising, custody, recordkeeping and unethical practices
were proposed for amendment by the California Department of Corporations.
Additionally, new rules on written disclosures, misuse of material nonpublic
information, soft dollars for brokerage and research services, solicitation
payments, and business continuity plans were proposed. ¶12,211
(ip
access user), ¶12,214
(ip
access user), ¶12,215D
(ip
access user), ¶12,217
(ip
access user), ¶12,218A
(ip
access user), ¶12,225
(ip
access user), ¶12,219A
(ip
access user), ¶12,219B
(ip
access user), ¶12,219C
(ip
access user), ¶12,219D
(ip
access user), ¶12,219
(ip
access user).
OREGON Proposes to Add NSMIA Provisions
for Variable Annuities and Adopt New Rule for Licensees Selling or Advising
about Securities on Financial Institution or Trust Company Premises
As proposed, federal covered security notice filing rules would be expanded
to provide requirements for offering and selling variable annuities, and
a new rule would set forth the requirements for broker-dealers, salespersons,
investment advisers and investment adviser representatives to sell or
advise about securities on the premises of financial institutions or trust
companies. A hearing on the proposals by the Oregon Division of Finance
and Corporate Securities of the Department of Consumer and Business Services
was held on September 28, 2007. ¶47,556N
(ip
access user), ¶47,556P
(ip
access user), ¶47,619A
(ip
access user).
NSMIA, Rule 10b-10 did not preempt
state enforcement action
The Court of Appeal of California held in People v. Edward D. Jones
& Co. that neither the National Securities Markets Improvement
Act of 1996 (NSMIA) nor the disclosure requirements of federal Rule 10b-10
preempted a state enforcement action against a broker-dealer for failing
to disclose adequately "shelf-space" agreements with certain
preferred mutual funds. The appellate court concluded that NSMIA's savings
clause expressly preserves the authority of state agencies to investigate
and bring enforcement actions with respect to fraud, deceit, or unlawful
conduct by broker-dealers in connection with securities or securities
transactions. The appellate court also ruled that no conflict existed
between Rule 10b-10 and California's action because the federal rule is
not determinative of what a broker-dealer must disclose in a particular
securities transaction. The decision is reported at ¶74,649
(ip
access user).
Aspen Federal Securities Publications
The Regulation of Corporate Disclosure,
Third Edition, by J. Robert Brown, Jr
The latest release, 2008-1 Supplement, will be live on the IRN Corporate
Governance Library in early October. This complete and up-to-date handbook
on the issue of corporate disclosure covers the impact of the federal
securities laws on both informal communications and the process of communicating
with shareholders. This latest update includes the new SEC rule on Internet
disclosure of proxy materials; case law analyzing the application of primary
liability to vendors, investment banks and other third parties, including
In re Charter, which is pending before the Supreme Court; SEC actions
enforcing the new certification requirements for CEOs and CFOs; SEC actions
requiring changes to a company’s corporate governance provisions;
an update on cases addressing the group pleading doctrine; and an update
on SEC actions and interpretations governing audit committees of the board
of directors.
Offerings of Asset-Backed Securities,
by John Arnholz and Edward E. Gainor
The latest supplement will be live on the IRN Commodities and Derivative
Integrated Library in early October. This comprehensive resource offers
information on how to do asset-backed deals from a very practical perspective.
It focuses on real-world know-how, delivering: a step-by-step approach
to spotting issues and solving problems; practical, transaction-oriented
advice from the perspective of experienced practitioners; insights into
specific issues that frequently arise in transactions; and solutions to
common problems. Offerings of Asset-Backed Securities also includes “issue-spotting”
checklists and other formatting tools to ensure that this resource serves
as a reliable, quick reference. This latest update includes updated guidance
regarding the disclosure and reporting requirements under Regulation AB;
lessons learned during the 2007 10-K filing season; insights into developing
ABS market practices under Regulation AB and the securities offering reform
rules; and updated treatment of ERISA issues in securitization to reflect
recent legislative changes.
Financial Reporting Handbook, by Michael
Young
The latest release, Release 16, will be live on the IRN Corporate Governance
Library in mid-October. This reference provides quick access to critical
aspects of financial reporting. In addition to covering the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, SEC rules and regulations, standards of the Independence Standards
Board and the AICPA and requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, NASDAQ,
and the American Stock Exchange, the Financial Reporting Handbook tackles
important underlying themes such as the centrality of the audit committee,
the individual responsibility of executives, and the integrity of the
outside auditor.
Hot Topic of the Month
This month’s hot topic is sub-prime
mortgage lending crisis – regulation and risk management.
The SEC is investigating the exposure of market participants to subprime
mortgages and related products to help it determine whether a regulatory
response is appropriate. Although the Commission does not directly regulate
the origination and sale of mortgage loans, it does have a role when the
mortgages are sold to securitization vehicles and when securities are
backed by the loans. The default by homeowners with subprime credit on
mortgage obligations has had a broad impact, including a direct effect
on securities that reference pools of subprime mortgages. More broadly,
as default levels rose, market participants began to question the value
of a variety of financial products. As those valuations came into doubt,
liquidity in the products have fallen sharply, further complicating the
task of valuing particularly complex instruments.
In this environment, the Commission has undertaken
several initiatives, including outreach to market participants to understand
their exposure to subprime mortgages and to evaluate the operational and
liquidity issues. The staff also is continuing to work with other regulators
in the President's Working Group on Financial Markets, including the Treasury
Department, Federal Reserve Board and CFTC, to analyze and discuss market
conditions. In addition, the SEC is responding through its oversight of
investment companies, some of which may invest in securities backed by
subprime mortgages such as collateralized debt obligations and asset-backed
commercial paper. Following the emergence in mid-July of significant turbulence
in the subprime market, the staff contacted fund representatives and pricing
agents to determine the effect on funds in terms of pricing their portfolio
holdings and maintaining sufficient liquidity to meet redemptions.
The SEC has also turned attention to rating
agencies, which have faced criticism over the accuracy of their ratings
of residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”). Critics
fault the rating agencies for not taking rating action sooner on those
securities as the performance of underlying assets deteriorated, and for
not maintaining independence from the issuers and underwriters of those
securities. Accordingly, the Commission has begun a review of the policies
and procedures of Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations
regarding ratings of RMBS and collateralized debt obligations.
We publish information on the subprime mortgage
crisis, including both regulatory and risk management aspects, in a range
of securities law resources, noted below. Coverage of the banking regulatory
aspects is available elsewhere, in various banking titles (e.g., Federal
Banking Law Reporter).
IPO Vital Signs
IPO Vital Signs, an advanced
IPO research analysis tool, assists IPO professionals and pre-IPO companies
satisfy their most challenging research needs and answers hundreds of
mission critical questions for all the players in the IPO process.
IPO Vital Signs’ tabular data analyses focus on issues
surrounding client advisement, deal negotiation, and prospectus disclosure.
IPO Week in Review, a weekly
e-newsletter to keep professionals up to date with recent filing and going
public activity, is an important element of the IPO Vital Signs system
or is available by separate subscription. Coverage includes a monthly
feature article on recent trends in going public in the U.S.
To see how an IPO Vital Sign
works click on the Vital Sign title below:
#1001.
IPO Offerings
Evaluate IPO professional firms (“IPO
Team Members”) by IPO activity for 2007.
Review IPO Team Members by fourteen characteristics
- Offer Date
- SIC Code
- Ticker Symbol
- Exchange
- Offer Price
- Number of Shares
- Gross Spread
- Offer Amount
- Market Capitalization
- Revenue
- Net Income
- Net Worth
- Days in Registration
- Estimated Out-of-Pocket Expenses
Tip! Scroll left to right,
and re-sort the table of data by clicking a column heading. Re-arrange
a "professional" column in alphabetical order and scroll to
see a particular firm’s activity.
|